Ravyn Property Intelligence Report — Sample

Parcel RVN-TX-TRAVIS-980320 · Travis County, Texas

Report: SAMPLE-PROPERTY-INTELLIGENCE-REPORT Built: 2026-09-06 Run: RAVYN_GEO_HUNTER_PRODUCTION 1.0.0 · generated 2026-09-07T02:42:01Z Queue: SELL_AS_INTELLIGENCE (RAVYN_RESERVED=NO)

This is a real parcel from the production Ravyn Geo-Hunter queue. Owner-of-record identity is masked; every other figure is shown exactly as recorded. Every figure carries a truth label: AUTHORITATIVE / OFFICIAL_REFERENCE / CALCULATED / HEURISTIC / MIXED / UNKNOWN. Anything not supported by the run record is marked UNKNOWN, with the source that would fill it named.

1. Executive Summary

RVN-TX-TRAVIS-980320 is a real Travis County, TX parcel — TCAD-published VACANT LOT, 0.2514 published acres, published market value $92, situs "CORVALLIS DR 78747" (Austin 78747 area) AUTHORITATIVE — TCAD. In the production geo-hunter run it scored 33.84/100 (RAVYN_OPPORTUNITY_SCORE) with DATA_CONFIDENCE 71.25 and was queued SELL_AS_INTELLIGENCE — a real, non-reserved parcel from the run's sellable inventory CALCULATED. The score is low, and the report says why in the open: change and distress components contribute 0 because no admitted source carries those records (sections 10–11), and hazards are county-level values applied at the parcel (section 8). The parcel's strengths per the run: a published vacant 0.25-acre lot in a platted subdivision with zero improvement burden, 1,198 addresses within 1 km, and nearest transport 10.0 m. The score is advisory input to diligence, not a buy or sell recommendation; every acquisition decision is the reader's, and this report asserts no title, zoning, survey, appraisal, or buildability determination.

2. Property / Parcel AUTHORITATIVE

TCAD record fetched 2026-09-06T20:15:57Z (source: Travis Central Appraisal District; fetch URL in section 18).

FieldValueLabel
Land typeVACANT LOT (land_state_cd C1)AUTHORITATIVE
AreaGIS_acres 0.25140271; tcad_acres 0.25139999; legal_acre "2514"AUTHORITATIVE
Published valuesmarket_value $92, appraised_val $92, assessed_val $92 (published by TCAD, not our determination)AUTHORITATIVE
Improvement valuesimprv_homesite_val 0; imprv_non_homesite_val 0; land_homesite_val 0; land_non_homesite_val $92AUTHORITATIVE
Legal description"THAXTON SUBD (SMALL LOT) PHS 1 BLK B LOT 37" (sub_dec "THAXTON SUBD (SMALL LOT) PHS 1"; abs_subdv_cd S21457)AUTHORITATIVE
Deeddeed_num null, deed_date null in the fetched record → deed date UNKNOWNAUTHORITATIVE / UNKNOWN
Situs"CORVALLIS DR 78747" — no street number publishedAUTHORITATIVE
Geo id0340060301; county_parcel_id TX-TRAVIS-980320; OBJECTID 353077AUTHORITATIVE
Geometry recordShape.STArea() 10,951.0576 — source-native square feet (cross-check: 0.25140271 ac × 43,560 ft²/ac = 10,951.1 ft², consistent); Shape.STLength() 596.19 (source units as published)AUTHORITATIVE + CALCULATED
Owner of record[MASKED] — a corporate LLC per the published record; owner name, owner id, and owner mailing address are masked in this sampleAUTHORITATIVE (published, masked)
TCAD detail pagehttps://stage.travis.prodigycad.com/property-detail/980320OFFICIAL_REFERENCE

3. Map — partial record, honest note

The production run's queue record carries no centroid coordinates for this parcel (CENTROID_X / CENTROID_Y are null in the fetched TCAD row — the run fetched attributes, and geometry was not captured to the queue file) [Q tcad]. No map image is rendered from anything the record does not contain; no coordinates are invented.

What the record does provide for locating the parcel: TCAD-published situs "CORVALLIS DR 78747", subdivision "THAXTON SUBD (SMALL LOT) PHS 1 BLK B LOT 37", geo_id 0340060301, and the official TCAD detail page (linked above), which is the authoritative map reference. The TCAD MapServer query used by the run (returnGeometry=true; URL in section 18) is the direct path to the parcel geometry — fetching and plotting it is item 7 in NEXT DILIGENCE STEPS.

4. Physical Context AUTHORITATIVE + CALCULATED

5. Building Context — what the record holds

6. Location OFFICIAL_REFERENCE

Within 1 km of the parcel: 12 places, 1,198 addresses, nearest transportation segment 10.0 m.

Market context (CALCULATED — the run's market-wave ranking over 79 Travis-area postcodes): market 78747 ranks 38 of 79 with wave score 57.3734. Volume inputs: 8,604 addresses, 4,736 buildings, 97 places, 1,417 transport segments, 1 real parcel present. Percentile inputs: address 55.06, building 56.33, parcel-presence 97.47, place 29.75, transport 51.27. The run's top-ranked market is 78704 (wave score 81.9937), then 78745 (80.981), 78702 (77.8165), 78723 (77.5), 78660 (76.5506).

7. Terrain OFFICIAL_REFERENCE (USGS 3DEP)

8. Hazards OFFICIAL_REFERENCE (FEMA NRI v1.20, county level)

Travis County row (STCOFIPS 48453), applied at the parcel:

HazardEALS (published)RatingFavor (100 − EALS, run's documented transform)
Flood (IFLD)99.01Relatively High0.9901
Wildfire (WFIR)92.68Relatively Moderate7.3155
Wind (SWND)96.43Relatively High3.5659
Soilno FEMA NRI soil hazard existsUNAVAILABLE (recorded, not fabricated)
Avalanche / Coastal floodempty in the Travis County rowNOT_APPLICABLE

County context: RISK_SCORE 97.74, EAL_SCORE 98.51, rating "Relatively High"; county population 1,285,769.

Granularity caveat (stated, not hidden): these are county-level values applied at the parcel. They describe Travis County, not this specific 0.25-acre corner of it; no census-tract NRI rows were used.

9. Development Signals AUTHORITATIVE presence only

Entity chain (production run): 2 nodes — address_id 74de804e-f513-4c99-9aa3-38a58174accf ↔ county_parcel_id TX-TRAVIS-980320, link type HEURISTIC (spatial KNN + street/zip match). This is an entity-resolution link, not a title opinion.

No zoning determination is made anywhere in this report: no official zoning record was consulted by the run.

10. Distress Signals — UNKNOWN (honest)

All three DISTRESS inputs are UNAVAILABLE in the production run:

The component is an honest NULL and contributes 0 to the score. No distress figure is invented.

11. Change Signals — UNKNOWN (honest)

All three CHANGE inputs are UNAVAILABLE: deed_recency (TCAD rows carry deed_num but deed_date is null — for this parcel deed_num itself is null — so no recency can be computed; challenger: Travis County Clerk deed recordings with dates); imprv_recency (published record shows no improvement — VACANT LOT); imagery_timeline (no imagery timeline exists locally; the certified canary's STAC search over the parcel bbox returned 0 items — "catalog is empty"; challenger: NASA/USGS HLS imagery, NAIP aerial imagery). The component contributes 0. The run's own words: "recorded, not invented."

12. Opportunity Score CALCULATED

33.84/100
RAVYN_OPPORTUNITY_SCORE
71.25
DATA_CONFIDENCE_SCORE
SELL_AS_INTELLIGENCE
Queue disposition
ComponentWeightScoreStatus
CHANGE0.100.0all 3 inputs UNAVAILABLE
DEVELOPMENT0.1548.753/3 inputs admitted
DISTRESS0.15NULL (contributes 0)all 3 inputs UNAVAILABLE
EXIT_OPTION0.2038.754/4 inputs admitted
LAND0.1581.254/4 inputs admitted
LOCATION0.1060.03/3 inputs admitted
RISK0.153.95723/4 admitted; county-level hazard granularity

Recomputation: 0.10(0.0) + 0.15(48.75) + 0.15(0) + 0.20(38.75) + 0.15(81.25) + 0.10(60.0) + 0.15(3.9572) = 33.8436 → 33.84, matching the published score.

Reading the score honestly: the two strongest components are LAND (81.25 — a published vacant lot with zero improvement burden) and LOCATION (60.0); the total is pulled down by components whose data simply does not exist yet (CHANGE 0, DISTRESS 0) and by the county-level risk transform. The score is what the admitted inputs support — no more.

Queue rule: real candidates ranked below the top-third keep band carry real intelligence value and enter the sellable queue ("real candidate ranked below the top-third keep band; carries real intelligence value"). In this run: 7 candidates, 4 real, 2 KEEP_FOR_RAVYN (177373 at 41.66, 475540 at 36.09), 2 SELL_AS_INTELLIGENCE (980320 at 33.84, 985825 at 31.41), 3 synthetic seeds REJECT (never scored).

13. Data Confidence CALCULATED (separate from the score)

DATA_CONFIDENCE_SCORE 71.25 — the weighted share of admitted inputs, exposed as its own number and never collapsed into the score:

ComponentAdmitted / TotalShareWeight
CHANGE0/30.00.10
DEVELOPMENT3/31.00.15
DISTRESS0/30.00.15
EXIT_OPTION4/41.00.20
LAND4/41.00.15
LOCATION3/31.00.10
RISK3/40.750.15

Weighted share = 0.7125 → 71.25 (recomputed here; matches). In plain terms: about 71% of the inputs the score would use were actually available for this parcel; the missing 29% is exactly the distress, change, and soil inputs named in sections 8, 10, and 11.

14. Potential Exit Strategies — context only, no valuation

No comparable-sales source is connected to this pipeline; no comp is consulted or synthesized, and therefore no exit valuation is computed here (a comp-based exit analysis would require appraisal/MLS comp data via an authoritative professional source).

What is presented instead, labeled:

15. Risks — named with mechanisms

  1. Score 33.84/100 is a below-mid score; under the certified canary's advisory 60/100 screening bar it would be flagged below-bar (the production run instead uses top-third rank normalization with no absolute bar — both regimes are disclosed; they are not comparable numbers).
  2. Two of seven score components (CHANGE, DISTRESS) contribute 0 because their inputs are entirely unavailable — the score systematically under-represents parcels whose distress/change records are not yet sourced.
  3. Hazard inputs are county-level values applied at the parcel (granularity risk — see section 8).
  4. Entity-resolution link is HEURISTIC (KNN + situs match), not an official address match; the situs carries no street number.
  5. No title, zoning, survey, appraisal, or buildability determination exists in this report — each is a professional/official determination the buyer must obtain before transacting.
  6. No centroid geometry was captured in this run's queue record, so parcel-boundary verification from this report alone is not possible (section 3).
  7. Deed date is null in the fetched record — recency of ownership cannot be asserted (section 11).

16. Unknowns — named, not buried

Title status (requires a title professional); real tax-delinquency and vacancy records (Travis County Tax Office); zoning per official source (city/county verification); survey/boundary determination (registered surveyor); appraisal (licensed appraiser — TCAD values are published reference only); deed date (null in the fetched TCAD record); imagery change timeline (STAC catalog empty); comparable sales (no comp source connected); on-parcel building-intersect count (not recorded in this run); slope/aspect for this parcel (not recorded in this run's queue file); soil hazard (no FEMA NRI soil hazard exists).

17. Next Diligence Steps — prioritized

  1. Title search — authoritative title professional (required before any transaction consideration).
  2. Official zoning verification — city/county zoning authority for the platted subdivision lot.
  3. Survey / boundary — registered surveyor; the run did not capture parcel geometry.
  4. Travis County Tax Office — delinquent tax roll and vacancy records (fills the DISTRESS gap; challenger sources named by the run).
  5. Travis County Clerk — deed recordings with dates (fills deed recency; challenger source named by the run).
  6. Appraisal — licensed appraiser, if a value determination is needed; TCAD's $92 is a published reference value.
  7. Parcel geometry fetch — the run's own TCAD MapServer URL requests returnGeometry=true; plot the returned polygon to verify bounds and area.
  8. USGS 3DEP slope derivation — same EPQS source the run used for elevation (method precedent: certified enrichment of sibling parcel 475540).
  9. Imagery timeline — NASA/USGS HLS or NAIP aerial imagery (challenger sources named by the run).
  10. Comps — appraisal/MLS comp data via an authoritative professional source (none is connected today).

18. Source Evidence

RefPath (activation root, read-only)What it supplied
Q/Users/wheeler/reports/pwios-revenue-activation-20260906T191713Z/02-geo-hunter/promotion/run-1/RVN-TX-TRAVIS-980320-queue.jsonper-parcel record: score, confidence, components, tcad, usgs, chain, provenance
QO/Users/wheeler/reports/pwios-revenue-activation-20260906T191713Z/02-geo-hunter/promotion/run-1/queue-output.jsonrun-level record: queues, candidates, market block, market_waves_top, per_source_confidence, challengers
MW/Users/wheeler/reports/pwios-revenue-activation-20260906T191713Z/02-geo-hunter/promotion/run-1/market-waves.jsonfull market-wave ranking (79 postcodes)
D/Users/wheeler/reports/pwios-revenue-activation-20260906T191713Z/03-ravyn-acquisition/DOSSIER-RVN-TX-TRAVIS-475540.mdverified sibling-parcel dossier (planning anchors, comp policy, terrain precedent)
SR/Users/wheeler/reports/pwios-revenue-activation-20260906T191713Z/04-products/SAMPLE-REPORT-475540.mdcertified sample-report regime context (60/100 advisory bar; rank-normalization rule)
M/Users/wheeler/reports/pwios-first-cash-sprint-20260907T030210Z/00-baseline/MISSION.mdmission baseline (realized revenue state)

Run provenance (as recorded in the run, quoted): pipeline RAVYN_GEO_HUNTER_PRODUCTION 1.0.0; generated_at_utc 2026-09-07T02:42:01Z; production_database_touched: false; scratch database pwios_geohunter_probe; CODE_SHA 4a608071c700e0e622e47fa14261507fcb96ef79; candidate INPUT_HASH 7e140644d6954b8a299b3bbcd8e6df1cde8ff9b1b4e63d3332e306c0110ce06b; run INPUT_HASH 3c74a4b8522d6220f6c33edb0c77d94e777f8a4a058e57cc9f87d90a64ecbf28. Source timestamps (run record): tcad_fetches 2026-09-06T20:17:08Z; overture_slice 2026-09-05 10:40:53-07; fema_nri_county 2026-09-05T18:33:30Z (certified enrichment fetch; zip sha256 verified at copy); usgs_3dep 2026-09-06T20:17:08Z. Admitted sources by authority: travis_county_gis_tcad_parcels AUTHORITATIVE (4 rows used); overture_2026-08-19_0_travis_slice OFFICIAL_REFERENCE (2,054,456 rows); fema_nri_v120_county_travis OFFICIAL_REFERENCE (1 row); usgs_3dep_epqs OFFICIAL_REFERENCE (4 rows); pwios_entity_resolution MIXED (6 rows).

Honesty boundary (this block is the contract — same wording as the offer page)

This report is property intelligence assembled from labeled public records. It is NOT an appraisal — published TCAD values are reference values, not value determinations (a licensed appraiser's job). It is NOT a title report or title opinion — owner-of-record is published data, not a title determination (a title professional's job). It is NOT a zoning approval — no official zoning record was consulted. It is NOT a survey — geometry is source data plus computed checks (a registered surveyor's job). It is NOT an inspection. It is NOT an engineering report. It is NOT a legal opinion, NOT tax advice, NOT investment advice, and NOT a buy/sell recommendation — the score is advisory, computed by deterministic rules over labeled inputs, and every acquisition decision is the reader's. If a figure is unknown, this report says UNKNOWN rather than guessing.